In WSB v FOL, the Enterprise Court docket docket dismissed an software program to place apart an order dismissing an issue to an arbitration award beneath half 67 (substantive jurisdiction) and half 68 (important irregularity) of the Arbitration Act 1996 and refusing permission to attraction beneath half 69 (stage of laws) with no listening to. It held that the place the courtroom exercise routines its powers to search out out challenges beneath half 67 and half 68 of the Act on paper, the claimant would possibly search an oral rehearing on the hazard of indemnity costs (paragraph O.8.7 of the newly printed Enterprise Court docket docket Info) . An oral listening to would solely be permitted if the declare had an precise prospect of success or completely different good objective. However, no correct to an oral rehearing exists beneath half 69 of the Act (which is omitted from paragraph O.8.7 of the Info). Half 69(5) permitted the courtroom to ponder if a chunk 69 drawback required a listening to, nonetheless it was too late to ask for an oral listening to as quickly because the willpower beneath half 69(5) was made on paper. The selection clearly items out the slim limits whereby the courtroom will intervene in arbitral awards and the robust methodology of the judiciary when considering functions for oral hearings.